Message282247
| Author | vstinner |
|---|---|
| Recipients | serhiy.storchaka, vstinner |
| Date | 2016-12-02.16:10:15 |
| SpamBayes Score | -1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified | Yes |
| Message-id | <1480695015.62.0.0439223890982.issue28858@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content | |
|---|---|
Oh, I didn't understand that the regression was introduced by the revision b9c9691c72c5. The purpose of this revision was to *reduce* the memory usage of the C stack!? It seems like _PyObject_CallArg1() uses more stack memory than PyObject_CallFunctionObjArgs(). PyObject_CallFunctionObjArgs() allocates 4O bytes (5*sizeof(PyObject*)) on the stack. At least, I can say that when the crash occurs, _PyObject_FastCallDict() is not the gdb backtrace. |
|
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2016-12-02 16:10:15 | vstinner | set | recipients: + vstinner, serhiy.storchaka |
| 2016-12-02 16:10:15 | vstinner | set | messageid: <1480695015.62.0.0439223890982.issue28858@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| 2016-12-02 16:10:15 | vstinner | link | issue28858 messages |
| 2016-12-02 16:10:15 | vstinner | create | |