Message282384
| Author | serhiy.storchaka |
|---|---|
| Recipients | serhiy.storchaka, vstinner |
| Date | 2016-12-05.05:52:57 |
| SpamBayes Score | -1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified | Yes |
| Message-id | <1480917178.12.0.704656166919.issue28870@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content | |
|---|---|
> What do you think of using alloca() instead of an "PyObject *small_stack[5];" which has a fixed size? alloca() is not in POSIX.1. I afraid it would make CPython less portable. > Note: About your patch, try to avoid _PyObject_CallArg1() if you care of the usage of the C stack, see issue #28858. I don't understand how can I avoid it. > How do you check the stack consumption of PyObject_CallFunctionObjArgs()? Using a script from issue28858. |
|
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2016-12-05 05:52:58 | serhiy.storchaka | set | recipients: + serhiy.storchaka, vstinner |
| 2016-12-05 05:52:58 | serhiy.storchaka | set | messageid: <1480917178.12.0.704656166919.issue28870@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| 2016-12-05 05:52:58 | serhiy.storchaka | link | issue28870 messages |
| 2016-12-05 05:52:57 | serhiy.storchaka | create | |