Message282976
| Author | jdemeyer |
|---|---|
| Recipients | Ringding, Trundle, aronacher, benjamin.peterson, doko, gvanrossum, jdemeyer, prologic, python-dev, sebastinas, serhiy.storchaka, thansen, vstinner |
| Date | 2016-12-12.09:42:34 |
| SpamBayes Score | -1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified | Yes |
| Message-id | <1481535754.27.0.013632245314.issue5322@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content | |
|---|---|
@serhiy.storchaka: yes, changing the order of the base classes fixes the issue with __new__. Also manually assigning __new__ works, like
class C(A, B):
__new__ = B.__new__
What is broken by this patch is only the auto-detection of which __new__ (really, which tp_new) should be called.
@doko: not "another regression", it's exactly the one that we are talking about. |
|
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2016-12-12 09:42:34 | jdemeyer | set | recipients: + jdemeyer, gvanrossum, doko, vstinner, sebastinas, benjamin.peterson, aronacher, prologic, Trundle, Ringding, python-dev, serhiy.storchaka, thansen |
| 2016-12-12 09:42:34 | jdemeyer | set | messageid: <1481535754.27.0.013632245314.issue5322@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| 2016-12-12 09:42:34 | jdemeyer | link | issue5322 messages |
| 2016-12-12 09:42:34 | jdemeyer | create | |