Message283298
| Author | vstinner |
|---|---|
| Recipients | python-dev, serhiy.storchaka, vstinner |
| Date | 2016-12-15.13:33:59 |
| SpamBayes Score | -1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified | Yes |
| Message-id | <1481808840.01.0.586103861189.issue28870@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content | |
|---|---|
I don't propose to add _testcapi.pyobjectl_callfunctionobjargs_stacksize(). It's just to test the patch. I'm using it with: $./python -c 'import _testcapi; n=100; print(_testcapi.pyobjectl_callfunctionobjargs_stacksize(n) / (n+1))' 384.0 The value of n has no impact on the stack, it gives the same value with n=0. |
|
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2016-12-15 13:34:00 | vstinner | set | recipients: + vstinner, python-dev, serhiy.storchaka |
| 2016-12-15 13:34:00 | vstinner | set | messageid: <1481808840.01.0.586103861189.issue28870@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| 2016-12-15 13:33:59 | vstinner | link | issue28870 messages |
| 2016-12-15 13:33:59 | vstinner | create | |