Message283424
| Author | xiang.zhang |
|---|---|
| Recipients | christian.heimes, martin.panter, serhiy.storchaka, xdegaye, xiang.zhang, zach.ware |
| Date | 2016-12-16.18:37:02 |
| SpamBayes Score | -1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified | Yes |
| Message-id | <1481913423.08.0.910353621655.issue28971@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content | |
|---|---|
Xavier's plan sounds good. We could increase the line length limitation to 64K and add another limitation of the maximum lines a multi-line block could contain. Any limitation is violated the connection is refused. This situation seems quite similar to http.client.parse_headers, which doesn't get a standard length limitation or number limitation either. |
|
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2016-12-16 18:37:03 | xiang.zhang | set | recipients: + xiang.zhang, christian.heimes, xdegaye, martin.panter, zach.ware, serhiy.storchaka |
| 2016-12-16 18:37:03 | xiang.zhang | set | messageid: <1481913423.08.0.910353621655.issue28971@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| 2016-12-16 18:37:03 | xiang.zhang | link | issue28971 messages |
| 2016-12-16 18:37:02 | xiang.zhang | create | |