Message284527
| Author | vstinner |
|---|---|
| Recipients | python-dev, serhiy.storchaka, vstinner |
| Date | 2017-01-03.01:40:45 |
| SpamBayes Score | -1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified | Yes |
| Message-id | <1483407646.26.0.0527735337015.issue28870@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content | |
|---|---|
no_small_stack.patch: And now something completely different, a patch to remove the "small stack" alllocated on the C stack, always use the heap memory. FYI I created no_small_stack.patch from less_stack.patch. As expected, the stack usage is lower: * less_stack.patch: 384 bytes/call * no_small_stack.patch: 368 bytes/call I didn't check the performance of no_small_stack.patch yet. |
|
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2017-01-03 01:40:46 | vstinner | set | recipients: + vstinner, python-dev, serhiy.storchaka |
| 2017-01-03 01:40:46 | vstinner | set | messageid: <1483407646.26.0.0527735337015.issue28870@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| 2017-01-03 01:40:46 | vstinner | link | issue28870 messages |
| 2017-01-03 01:40:46 | vstinner | create | |