Message285124
| Author | vstinner |
|---|---|
| Recipients | python-dev, serhiy.storchaka, vstinner, xiang.zhang |
| Date | 2017-01-10.15:09:44 |
| SpamBayes Score | -1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified | Yes |
| Message-id | <1484060984.55.0.86574305826.issue28870@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content | |
|---|---|
> no_small_stack-2.patch decreases it only by 6% (with possible performance loss). Yeah, if we want to come back to Python 3.4 efficiency, we need to find the other functions which now uses more stack memory ;-) The discussed "small stack" buffers are only responsible of 96 bytes, not a big deal compared to the total of 4080 bytes. |
|
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2017-01-10 15:09:44 | vstinner | set | recipients: + vstinner, python-dev, serhiy.storchaka, xiang.zhang |
| 2017-01-10 15:09:44 | vstinner | set | messageid: <1484060984.55.0.86574305826.issue28870@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| 2017-01-10 15:09:44 | vstinner | link | issue28870 messages |
| 2017-01-10 15:09:44 | vstinner | create | |