Message285163
| Author | serhiy.storchaka |
|---|---|
| Recipients | serhiy.storchaka, vstinner |
| Date | 2017-01-10.23:00:50 |
| SpamBayes Score | -1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified | Yes |
| Message-id | <1484089251.08.0.26668900197.issue29227@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content | |
|---|---|
I didn't provide results with less_stack.patch because they were almost the same, just 1-3% faster. That might be just a random noise or compiler artifact. But may be an effect of inlining call_function(). Could you run full Python benchmarks? Decreasing the size of small stack doesn't impact a performance in these cases, but may impact a performance of calls with larger number of arguments. AFAIK the size of some small stacks already was decreased from 8 to 5. |
|
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2017-01-10 23:00:51 | serhiy.storchaka | set | recipients: + serhiy.storchaka, vstinner |
| 2017-01-10 23:00:51 | serhiy.storchaka | set | messageid: <1484089251.08.0.26668900197.issue29227@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| 2017-01-10 23:00:51 | serhiy.storchaka | link | issue29227 messages |
| 2017-01-10 23:00:50 | serhiy.storchaka | create | |