Message285889
| Author | vstinner |
|---|---|
| Recipients | python-dev, rhettinger, serhiy.storchaka, vstinner |
| Date | 2017-01-20.07:49:46 |
| SpamBayes Score | -1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified | Yes |
| Message-id | <CAMpsgwaj_7BHzXytbV4_=eXMTz3HsKsQR1=+g1PExhuVjtPB=A@mail.gmail.com> |
| In-reply-to | <8029157.harqS1mbvJ@raxxla> |
| Content | |
|---|---|
"The patch uses new feature of 3.6 -- supporting positional-only parameters in PyArg_ParseTupleAndKeywords() (see issue26282)." Oh, I didn't recall that it's a new feature. It's a nice feature by the way, thanks for implementing it :-) In that case, yeah it's ok to leave Python 3.5 unchanged. I proposed to fix 3.5 because I expected that you could use exactly the same patch. |
|
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2017-01-20 07:49:46 | vstinner | set | recipients: + vstinner, rhettinger, python-dev, serhiy.storchaka |
| 2017-01-20 07:49:46 | vstinner | link | issue29327 messages |
| 2017-01-20 07:49:46 | vstinner | create | |