Message286013
| Author | serhiy.storchaka |
|---|---|
| Recipients | eric.snow, python-dev, serhiy.storchaka, steve.dower, vstinner |
| Date | 2017-01-22.16:13:51 |
| SpamBayes Score | -1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified | Yes |
| Message-id | <1485101631.24.0.611852464896.issue29058@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content | |
|---|---|
Do you suggest to emit a warning when the user just defines Py_LIMITED_API without specifying concrete version?
#define Py_LIMITED_API
I think this would break too much code. And contradicts to the documentation.
If you mean something different, could you provide a patch? |
|
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2017-01-22 16:13:51 | serhiy.storchaka | set | recipients: + serhiy.storchaka, vstinner, python-dev, eric.snow, steve.dower |
| 2017-01-22 16:13:51 | serhiy.storchaka | set | messageid: <1485101631.24.0.611852464896.issue29058@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| 2017-01-22 16:13:51 | serhiy.storchaka | link | issue29058 messages |
| 2017-01-22 16:13:51 | serhiy.storchaka | create | |