Message286408
| Author | levkivskyi |
|---|---|
| Recipients | Inyeol.Lee, arigo, belopolsky, benjamin.peterson, danielsh, emptysquare, erickt, esc24, georg.brandl, glyph, gvanrossum, levkivskyi, rhettinger |
| Date | 2017-01-28.11:28:56 |
| SpamBayes Score | -1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified | Yes |
| Message-id | <1485602937.26.0.552045647376.issue10544@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content | |
|---|---|
> How about fixing CPython to raise SyntaxWarning or even SyntaxError? I think it is better to just fix the issue, i.e. make comprehensions be equivalent to for-loops even if they contain `yield`. (In particular this will lead to [(yield i) for i in range(5)] be SyntaxError outside function). The example of `await` shows that it is possible without leaking the loop variable into enclosing scope. |
|
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2017-01-28 11:28:57 | levkivskyi | set | recipients: + levkivskyi, gvanrossum, arigo, georg.brandl, rhettinger, belopolsky, benjamin.peterson, erickt, glyph, Inyeol.Lee, esc24, danielsh, emptysquare |
| 2017-01-28 11:28:57 | levkivskyi | set | messageid: <1485602937.26.0.552045647376.issue10544@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| 2017-01-28 11:28:57 | levkivskyi | link | issue10544 messages |
| 2017-01-28 11:28:56 | levkivskyi | create | |