Message286732
| Author | vstinner |
|---|---|
| Recipients | methane, python-dev, vstinner, yselivanov |
| Date | 2017-02-02.01:45:44 |
| SpamBayes Score | -1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified | Yes |
| Message-id | <1485999944.96.0.138506476762.issue29263@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content | |
|---|---|
INADA Naoki: "LOAD_METHOD support was based on tp_fastcall. (...) Other ideas to support LOAD_METHOD for C function are: * Add _PyMethodDescr_FastCallKeywords and call it in call_function." It seems like a very small subset of tp_fastcall. If it provides a significant speedup, I really like the idea :-) I would be happy to see a "subset of tp_fastcall" merged. At least my whole tp_fastcall experiment wouldn't be worthless :-) What would be the main change which would provide a speedup? Avoid the creation of a temporary tuple to pass positional arguments? |
|
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2017-02-02 01:45:44 | vstinner | set | recipients: + vstinner, methane, python-dev, yselivanov |
| 2017-02-02 01:45:44 | vstinner | set | messageid: <1485999944.96.0.138506476762.issue29263@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| 2017-02-02 01:45:44 | vstinner | link | issue29263 messages |
| 2017-02-02 01:45:44 | vstinner | create | |