Message288804
| Author | vstinner |
|---|---|
| Recipients | gvanrossum, r.david.murray, serhiy.storchaka, vstinner |
| Date | 2017-03-02.15:09:58 |
| SpamBayes Score | -1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified | Yes |
| Message-id | <CAMpsgwafpSog5if_MfPu+eJwTfkq+AOwd7n-PfjRPF-=0s7ThA@mail.gmail.com> |
| In-reply-to | <1488466762.53.0.124731620885.issue29695@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| Content | |
|---|---|
R. David Murray added the comment: > I don't think we should do it without deprecation, since it could break working code. But it certainly sounds like a marginal case: I doubt there is *much* code that uses the existing keyword names. I'm not sure that it's worth it to add a deprecation warning in Python 3.7. It's trivial to fix code passing an argument by keyword rather than by position. |
|
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2017-03-02 15:09:58 | vstinner | set | recipients: + vstinner, gvanrossum, r.david.murray, serhiy.storchaka |
| 2017-03-02 15:09:58 | vstinner | link | issue29695 messages |
| 2017-03-02 15:09:58 | vstinner | create | |