Message289933
| Author | steven.daprano |
|---|---|
| Recipients | barry, jwilk, ncoghlan, steven.daprano |
| Date | 2017-03-21.11:17:38 |
| SpamBayes Score | -1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified | Yes |
| Message-id | <1490095058.41.0.603849165332.issue29857@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content | |
|---|---|
Why is the name flagged as a private implementation detail? I.e. a single leading underscore. I'd be reluctant to rely on this in production code, given how strong the _private convention is. Suggest just `sys.raw_args` instead. |
|
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2017-03-21 11:17:38 | steven.daprano | set | recipients: + steven.daprano, barry, ncoghlan, jwilk |
| 2017-03-21 11:17:38 | steven.daprano | set | messageid: <1490095058.41.0.603849165332.issue29857@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| 2017-03-21 11:17:38 | steven.daprano | link | issue29857 messages |
| 2017-03-21 11:17:38 | steven.daprano | create | |