Message289935
| Author | barry |
|---|---|
| Recipients | barry, jwilk, ncoghlan, steven.daprano, vstinner |
| Date | 2017-03-21.13:43:20 |
| SpamBayes Score | -1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified | Yes |
| Message-id | <20170321094316.517346a0@subdivisions.wooz.org> |
| In-reply-to | <1490096837.04.0.42920077295.issue29857@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| Content | |
|---|---|
On Mar 21, 2017, at 11:47 AM, STINNER Victor wrote: >No, text please. Text is just more convenient in Python, and it's trivial to >retrieve original bytes: > >raw_args_bytes = [os.fsencode(arg) for arg in sys._raw_args] Well, "raw args" implies minimal or no processing, so bytes would make the most sense. It doesn't bother me that it's inconvenient; this won't be an oft used API and the conversion to strings should be just as easy. |
|
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2017-03-21 13:43:20 | barry | set | recipients: + barry, ncoghlan, vstinner, jwilk, steven.daprano |
| 2017-03-21 13:43:20 | barry | link | issue29857 messages |
| 2017-03-21 13:43:20 | barry | create | |