Message289941
| Author | vstinner |
|---|---|
| Recipients | barry, jwilk, ncoghlan, steven.daprano, vstinner |
| Date | 2017-03-21.15:32:33 |
| SpamBayes Score | -1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified | Yes |
| Message-id | <1490110353.28.0.296729768618.issue29857@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content | |
|---|---|
> If the embedding application doesn't call PySys_SetArgv or PySys_SetArgvEx, then there is no `argv` attribute defined in the sys module (I wasn't actually sure what happened in that case, so I went and checked the code). Ok, so just don't define sys._raw_argv in that case. But it doesn't seem enough to me to justify to make the attribute private. https://docs.python.org/dev/library/sys.html#sys.getallocatedblocks can be seen as an implementation detail.The method name has no underscore prefix, but a simple fallback: return 0 if the feature is is not implemented. |
|
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2017-03-21 15:32:33 | vstinner | set | recipients: + vstinner, barry, ncoghlan, jwilk, steven.daprano |
| 2017-03-21 15:32:33 | vstinner | set | messageid: <1490110353.28.0.296729768618.issue29857@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| 2017-03-21 15:32:33 | vstinner | link | issue29857 messages |
| 2017-03-21 15:32:33 | vstinner | create | |