Message290065
| Author | ned.deily |
|---|---|
| Recipients | cstratak, ishcherb, ned.deily, vinay.sajip |
| Date | 2017-03-23.22:40:03 |
| SpamBayes Score | -1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified | Yes |
| Message-id | <1490308803.63.0.227651731871.issue29804@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content | |
|---|---|
Technically speaking, we do not officially support arm64 in our release process as we have no arm64 buildbots nor an identified core developer for the platform; see PEP 11 for the policy details. So there is no place to test a fix if there was one identified. That said, it would be good to fix the problem if someone is willing to provide a fix and test it or determine that the issue here is a libffi problem. It would be even better if we could make arm64 an officially supported platform as outlined. |
|
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2017-03-23 22:40:03 | ned.deily | set | recipients: + ned.deily, vinay.sajip, cstratak, ishcherb |
| 2017-03-23 22:40:03 | ned.deily | set | messageid: <1490308803.63.0.227651731871.issue29804@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| 2017-03-23 22:40:03 | ned.deily | link | issue29804 messages |
| 2017-03-23 22:40:03 | ned.deily | create | |