Message291272
| Author | giampaolo.rodola |
|---|---|
| Recipients | giampaolo.rodola, gvanrossum, neologix, vstinner, yselivanov |
| Date | 2017-04-07.13:11:44 |
| SpamBayes Score | -1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified | Yes |
| Message-id | <1491570704.76.0.86258702722.issue30014@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content | |
|---|---|
> My patch calls generic unregister() and register() of the base > classes, but it only uses one syscall per modify() call. Doesn't that mean doing 3 operations (unregister(), register(), modify()) instead of the current 2 (unregister(), register())? I don't see how it can be faster than a single modify() syscall. > Oh by the way, it seems like my patch changes KqueueSelector, > but your change doesn't. Am I right? You are right but it looks like you end up doing the same thing as unregister() and register(). kqueue() has no modify() method so I don't think it can benefit from this change. |
|
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2017-04-07 13:11:44 | giampaolo.rodola | set | recipients: + giampaolo.rodola, gvanrossum, vstinner, neologix, yselivanov |
| 2017-04-07 13:11:44 | giampaolo.rodola | set | messageid: <1491570704.76.0.86258702722.issue30014@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| 2017-04-07 13:11:44 | giampaolo.rodola | link | issue30014 messages |
| 2017-04-07 13:11:44 | giampaolo.rodola | create | |