Message292040
| Author | vstinner |
|---|---|
| Recipients | benjamin.peterson, eric.smith, mark.dickinson, vstinner |
| Date | 2017-04-21.12:59:46 |
| SpamBayes Score | -1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified | Yes |
| Message-id | <1492779586.22.0.767427033541.issue30124@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content | |
|---|---|
> Yes, I've read it. And I think the Clang folks are wrong in their interpretation of the standard. And even if they're not, they're going to break a lot of code with this change: the union trick has been widely accepted as a valid way to do things. If Clang decides or not to handle union will decide if Python has or has no to change dtoa.c :-) (I would prefer to keep -fstrict-aliasing). |
|
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2017-04-21 12:59:46 | vstinner | set | recipients: + vstinner, mark.dickinson, eric.smith, benjamin.peterson |
| 2017-04-21 12:59:46 | vstinner | set | messageid: <1492779586.22.0.767427033541.issue30124@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| 2017-04-21 12:59:46 | vstinner | link | issue30124 messages |
| 2017-04-21 12:59:46 | vstinner | create | |