Message292224
| Author | eric.smith |
|---|---|
| Recipients | benjamin.peterson, dim, eric.smith, mark.dickinson, serhiy.storchaka, vstinner |
| Date | 2017-04-24.11:34:08 |
| SpamBayes Score | -1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified | Yes |
| Message-id | <1493033648.77.0.625024240548.issue30124@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content | |
|---|---|
> Unfortunately, as far as I know, clang still does not support > function-level optimization pragmas. Maybe it was implemented > recently, but then you would still have to have a workaround> > for older versions. I realize the answer is probably "no", but I'll ask anyway. Do you know if they support whole-module optimization pragmas? That would still be better than mucking with makefiles to get a per-module flag. |
|
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2017-04-24 11:34:08 | eric.smith | set | recipients: + eric.smith, mark.dickinson, vstinner, benjamin.peterson, serhiy.storchaka, dim |
| 2017-04-24 11:34:08 | eric.smith | set | messageid: <1493033648.77.0.625024240548.issue30124@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| 2017-04-24 11:34:08 | eric.smith | link | issue30124 messages |
| 2017-04-24 11:34:08 | eric.smith | create | |