Message 292586 - Python tracker

Message292586

Author	neologix
Recipients	giampaolo.rodola, neologix, vstinner, yselivanov
Date	2017-04-29.09:24:18
SpamBayes Score	-1.0
Marked as misclassified	Yes
Message-id	<CAH_1eM1z7qrda-XiCPKBjqE2GJ2LvWgzCzE0TH=kaxEvM0n6kw@mail.gmail.com>
In-reply-to	<1491676313.63.0.225447568651.issue30014@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>

Content
The rationale for rejecting wouldn't be "DRY does not apply in this case", it would be that this makes the code more complicated, and that a negligible speedup would not be worth it. Now, thanks to your benchmark, a 10% speedup is not negligible, so that seems like a reasonable change. I'll have a look at your refactoring code, and once pushed, we can optimize modify().

Content

The rationale for rejecting wouldn't be "DRY does not apply in this
case", it would be that this makes the code more complicated, and that
a negligible speedup would not be worth it.
Now, thanks to your benchmark, a 10% speedup is not negligible, so
that seems like a reasonable change.
I'll have a look at your refactoring code, and once pushed, we can
optimize modify().

History
Date	User	Action	Args
2017-04-29 09:24:18	neologix	set	recipients: + neologix, vstinner, giampaolo.rodola, yselivanov
2017-04-29 09:24:18	neologix	link	issue30014 messages
2017-04-29 09:24:18	neologix	create