Message292869
| Author | vstinner |
|---|---|
| Recipients | MicroTransactionsMatterToo, ncoghlan, ned.deily, rbcollins, ronaldoussoren, vstinner |
| Date | 2017-05-03.09:41:40 |
| SpamBayes Score | -1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified | Yes |
| Message-id | <1493804500.12.0.938208835628.issue28087@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content | |
|---|---|
Instead of skipping the test, it would be safer to not provide select.poll() if it's known to be broken. Curl added a check in configure: https://github.com/curl/curl/commit/9297ca49f5f3caca938a679b9c1feeb719e61ddb The problem is that I understood that Python provides a single binary for all supported macOS versions. So if we go for a check, it should be done as runtime, as the current select_have_broken_poll() test written for macOS. On macOS without the bug, curl check takes 0.5 second which is not ideal :-/ Would it be possible to design a test which doesn't block? |
|
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2017-05-03 09:41:40 | vstinner | set | recipients: + vstinner, ronaldoussoren, ncoghlan, rbcollins, ned.deily, MicroTransactionsMatterToo |
| 2017-05-03 09:41:40 | vstinner | set | messageid: <1493804500.12.0.938208835628.issue28087@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| 2017-05-03 09:41:40 | vstinner | link | issue28087 messages |
| 2017-05-03 09:41:40 | vstinner | create | |