Message295444
| Author | eric.smith |
|---|---|
| Recipients | CuriousLearner, eric.smith, ncoghlan |
| Date | 2017-06-08.14:58:25 |
| SpamBayes Score | -1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified | Yes |
| Message-id | <1496933906.01.0.186708933012.issue30597@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content | |
|---|---|
That sounds good to me.
Just to elaborate on my earlier message, since it might have been too terse:
I think it would be misleading to give in error at:
print >>sys.stderr, "message"
and say:
Did you mean 'print("message")'?
since they're not equivalent. If you can produce the equivalent text in the error message, then that's fine with me:
Did you mean 'print("message", file=sys.stderr)'? |
|
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2017-06-08 14:58:26 | eric.smith | set | recipients: + eric.smith, ncoghlan, CuriousLearner |
| 2017-06-08 14:58:26 | eric.smith | set | messageid: <1496933906.01.0.186708933012.issue30597@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| 2017-06-08 14:58:25 | eric.smith | link | issue30597 messages |
| 2017-06-08 14:58:25 | eric.smith | create | |