Message298170
| Author | r.david.murray |
|---|---|
| Recipients | abarry, ezio.melotti, gvanrossum, jaraco, jayvdb, martin.panter, python-dev, r.david.murray, serhiy.storchaka, terry.reedy, vstinner, yan12125, ztane |
| Date | 2017-07-11.17:53:19 |
| SpamBayes Score | -1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified | Yes |
| Message-id | <1499795599.2.0.0303133062483.issue27364@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content | |
|---|---|
Also note that we have fixed a number of bugs in the stdlib code where a raw string was not used for a docstring when it should have been. And when I say bugs, I mean both formatting problems in pydoc, and doctest bugs. There may even have been a case where it produced a code bug, but I'm not sure I'm recalling that correctly :) So yes, requiring that a docstring containing backslashes be marked as a raw string is very intentional. |
|
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2017-07-11 17:53:19 | r.david.murray | set | recipients: + r.david.murray, gvanrossum, terry.reedy, jaraco, vstinner, ezio.melotti, python-dev, martin.panter, serhiy.storchaka, ztane, jayvdb, yan12125, abarry |
| 2017-07-11 17:53:19 | r.david.murray | set | messageid: <1499795599.2.0.0303133062483.issue27364@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| 2017-07-11 17:53:19 | r.david.murray | link | issue27364 messages |
| 2017-07-11 17:53:19 | r.david.murray | create | |