Message298960
| Author | pitrou |
|---|---|
| Recipients | Demur Rumed, Mark.Shannon, benjamin.peterson, christian.heimes, mark.dickinson, nascheme, pitrou, rhettinger, serhiy.storchaka, trent |
| Date | 2017-07-24.11:47:57 |
| SpamBayes Score | -1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified | Yes |
| Message-id | <1500896877.44.0.990651761664.issue17611@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content | |
|---|---|
> I don't like the new END_ITER instruction. This complicates (and slows down) the evaluation loop and the peepholer. I don't think it slows down anything in the eval loop. I agree it adds a bit of complexity. > This also adds a limitation on the peepholer (END_ITER can't be optimized out). It's an unconditional backedge, how could you optimize it? |
|
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2017-07-24 11:47:57 | pitrou | set | recipients: + pitrou, nascheme, rhettinger, mark.dickinson, christian.heimes, benjamin.peterson, trent, Mark.Shannon, serhiy.storchaka, Demur Rumed |
| 2017-07-24 11:47:57 | pitrou | set | messageid: <1500896877.44.0.990651761664.issue17611@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| 2017-07-24 11:47:57 | pitrou | link | issue17611 messages |
| 2017-07-24 11:47:57 | pitrou | create | |