Message300302
| Author | ced |
|---|---|
| Recipients | ced, r.david.murray |
| Date | 2017-08-15.17:12:16 |
| SpamBayes Score | -1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified | Yes |
| Message-id | <1502817136.29.0.313270905178.issue31210@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content | |
|---|---|
A last comment, I do not think it is an issue to follow posix way to parse PATH. But for me, the problem is that Python adds without sanitation the sys.prefix to the PYTHONPATH. So I think internally Python should not use PATH notation to extend the PYTHONPATH because it is not a robust notation. |
|
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2017-08-15 17:12:16 | ced | set | recipients: + ced, r.david.murray |
| 2017-08-15 17:12:16 | ced | set | messageid: <1502817136.29.0.313270905178.issue31210@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| 2017-08-15 17:12:16 | ced | link | issue31210 messages |
| 2017-08-15 17:12:16 | ced | create | |