Message300574
| Author | pitrou |
|---|---|
| Recipients | JohanAR, davin, gvanrossum, itamarst, ncoghlan, pitrou, python-dev, rhettinger, sbt, serhiy.storchaka, tim.peters, yselivanov, zzzeek |
| Date | 2017-08-19.08:53:41 |
| SpamBayes Score | -1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified | Yes |
| Message-id | <ee909ab3-f243-40e5-cab0-2f5ffc4e4467@free.fr> |
| In-reply-to | <1503091613.09.0.382886788001.issue14976@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| Content | |
|---|---|
Le 18/08/2017 à 23:26, Guido van Rossum a écrit : > > IIUC the end result would be a Queue whose put() works from signal handlers, GC callbacks and __del__, as long as it's unbounded, right? Yes. > And when it *is* bounded, it will give a decent message if the queue is full and the lock is already taken, right? Currently it gives a decent message on any bounded queue, even if not full. That may be improved, I'd have to investigate how. |
|
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2017-08-19 08:53:41 | pitrou | set | recipients: + pitrou, gvanrossum, tim.peters, rhettinger, ncoghlan, zzzeek, python-dev, sbt, serhiy.storchaka, JohanAR, yselivanov, itamarst, davin |
| 2017-08-19 08:53:41 | pitrou | link | issue14976 messages |
| 2017-08-19 08:53:41 | pitrou | create | |