Message300959
| Author | vaultah |
|---|---|
| Recipients | Arfrever, brett.cannon, eric.snow, ezio.melotti, mattheww, ncoghlan, vaultah |
| Date | 2017-08-28.18:25:21 |
| SpamBayes Score | -1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified | Yes |
| Message-id | <1503944721.91.0.26418626305.issue16217@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content | |
|---|---|
Since runpy also handles the execution of directories and zip files, I think it would be reasonable to clean up tracebacks in these cases, too. The ignore_modules argument would be a great addition to the traceback module. Should I create a separate issue/pull request for its implementation? |
|
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2017-08-28 18:25:21 | vaultah | set | recipients: + vaultah, brett.cannon, ncoghlan, mattheww, ezio.melotti, Arfrever, eric.snow |
| 2017-08-28 18:25:21 | vaultah | set | messageid: <1503944721.91.0.26418626305.issue16217@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| 2017-08-28 18:25:21 | vaultah | link | issue16217 messages |
| 2017-08-28 18:25:21 | vaultah | create | |