Message301090
| Author | pitrou |
|---|---|
| Recipients | brett.cannon, pitrou, vstinner, zach.ware |
| Date | 2017-09-01.09:18:26 |
| SpamBayes Score | -1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified | Yes |
| Message-id | <1504257506.84.0.652999601549.issue31217@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content | |
|---|---|
> It makes sure that you get a single object in memory for the same integer, and not only for Python "small integer singletons"? Yes. > About the -1000..1000 range: if a function leaks more than 1 memory block or more than 1 reference, there is already something wrong no? Well, the current code can still hide it, for example if a function leaks [1000, 0, 1000, 1000, 1000] references, the code says it's ok. |
|
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2017-09-01 09:18:26 | pitrou | set | recipients: + pitrou, brett.cannon, vstinner, zach.ware |
| 2017-09-01 09:18:26 | pitrou | set | messageid: <1504257506.84.0.652999601549.issue31217@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| 2017-09-01 09:18:26 | pitrou | link | issue31217 messages |
| 2017-09-01 09:18:26 | pitrou | create | |