Message301379
| Author | pitrou |
|---|---|
| Recipients | JohanAR, davin, gregory.p.smith, gvanrossum, itamarst, ncoghlan, pitrou, python-dev, rhettinger, sbt, serhiy.storchaka, tim.peters, yselivanov, zzzeek |
| Date | 2017-09-05.21:25:06 |
| SpamBayes Score | -1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified | Yes |
| Message-id | <a1dcad88-71b8-479d-b83e-b81e9e7c63ed@free.fr> |
| In-reply-to | <1504646514.11.0.279806038655.issue14976@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| Content | |
|---|---|
Le 05/09/2017 à 23:21, Gregory P. Smith a écrit : > > FYI - here is an appropriately licensed (WTFPL) very simple lock-free queue implemented in C Looks like it uses busy-waiting inside its get() equivalent. Also we would need a portable version of the atomic instructions used there (e.g. __sync_bool_compare_and_swap) :-) |
|
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2017-09-05 21:25:06 | pitrou | set | recipients: + pitrou, gvanrossum, tim.peters, rhettinger, gregory.p.smith, ncoghlan, zzzeek, python-dev, sbt, serhiy.storchaka, JohanAR, yselivanov, itamarst, davin |
| 2017-09-05 21:25:06 | pitrou | link | issue14976 messages |
| 2017-09-05 21:25:06 | pitrou | create | |