Message301383
| Author | pitrou |
|---|---|
| Recipients | JohanAR, davin, gregory.p.smith, gvanrossum, itamarst, ncoghlan, pitrou, python-dev, rhettinger, sbt, serhiy.storchaka, tim.peters, yselivanov, zzzeek |
| Date | 2017-09-05.22:10:19 |
| SpamBayes Score | -1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified | Yes |
| Message-id | <1504649419.15.0.996217226332.issue14976@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content | |
|---|---|
One tangential note about a potential full-fledged Queue in C: the pure Python implementation is fair towards consumers, as it uses a threading.Condition which is itself fair. Achieving the same thing in C may significantly complicate the implementation. Raymond would have to decide whether it's an important property to keep. The SimpleQueue class, being a separate API, is not tied by this constraint. |
|
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2017-09-05 22:10:19 | pitrou | set | recipients: + pitrou, gvanrossum, tim.peters, rhettinger, gregory.p.smith, ncoghlan, zzzeek, python-dev, sbt, serhiy.storchaka, JohanAR, yselivanov, itamarst, davin |
| 2017-09-05 22:10:19 | pitrou | set | messageid: <1504649419.15.0.996217226332.issue14976@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| 2017-09-05 22:10:19 | pitrou | link | issue14976 messages |
| 2017-09-05 22:10:19 | pitrou | create | |