Message302397
| Author | martin.panter |
|---|---|
| Recipients | Mariatta, docs@python, eric.smith, martin.panter |
| Date | 2017-09-18.00:14:23 |
| SpamBayes Score | -1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified | Yes |
| Message-id | <1505693664.79.0.92292632931.issue31487@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content | |
|---|---|
>>> f"{number:#0x}" # using integer format specifier
It’s not clear what your purpose was adding the above line, but the zero flag (0) does nothing because there is no “width” field. I think it could be misleading, because it is actually the “#x” codes that generate the “0x” prefix.
If you want to illustrate a minimum width, I suggest something like
>>> f"{number:#06x}"
'0x0400'
or (if the number is never negative)
>>> f"0x{number:04X}"
'0x0400'
Or if you don’t care about the width:
>>> f"{number:#x}"
'0x400' |
|
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2017-09-18 00:14:24 | martin.panter | set | recipients: + martin.panter, eric.smith, docs@python, Mariatta |
| 2017-09-18 00:14:24 | martin.panter | set | messageid: <1505693664.79.0.92292632931.issue31487@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| 2017-09-18 00:14:24 | martin.panter | link | issue31487 messages |
| 2017-09-18 00:14:23 | martin.panter | create | |