Message 302495 - Python tracker

Message302495

Author	eric.araujo
Recipients	eric.araujo, eric.snow, ezio.melotti, gvanrossum, martin.panter, pitrou, rbcollins, serhiy.storchaka, veky, vstinner
Date	2017-09-19.02:38:25
SpamBayes Score	-1.0
Marked as misclassified	Yes
Message-id	<1505788706.12.0.626789796515.issue13224@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
In-reply-to

Content
Martin Panter > I’m a bit confused. In the current patch, the new type_str() function > appears to use the “qualname” (which I support), but some of the test > changes seem to contradict this, e.g.: > >>> C.foo(1) > -classmethod <class 'test.test_descrtut.C'> 1 > +classmethod C 1 C is a qualname, as would be C.NestedD or something.<locals>.NestedD The qualname PEP explains why the module is not part of the qualname. Me > Finally, I don’t remember why I changed functions and modules when the two > original use cases were only for classes. The reason is a message by Nick on python-ideas.

Content

Martin Panter

> I’m a bit confused. In the current patch, the new type_str() function
> appears to use the “qualname” (which I support), but some of the test
> changes seem to contradict this, e.g.:

>  >>> C.foo(1)
> -classmethod <class 'test.test_descrtut.C'> 1
> +classmethod C 1

C is a qualname, as would be C.NestedD or something.<locals>.NestedD
The qualname PEP explains why the module is not part of the qualname.


Me
> Finally, I don’t remember why I changed functions and modules when the two
> original use cases were only for classes.

The reason is a message by Nick on python-ideas.

History
Date	User	Action	Args
2017-09-19 02:38:26	eric.araujo	set	recipients: + eric.araujo, gvanrossum, pitrou, vstinner, rbcollins, ezio.melotti, eric.snow, martin.panter, serhiy.storchaka, veky
2017-09-19 02:38:26	eric.araujo	set	messageid: <1505788706.12.0.626789796515.issue13224@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
2017-09-19 02:38:26	eric.araujo	link	issue13224 messages
2017-09-19 02:38:25	eric.araujo	create