Message302735
| Author | gvanrossum |
|---|---|
| Recipients | Andrew Lytvyn, asvetlov, gvanrossum, kwarunek, yselivanov |
| Date | 2017-09-22.03:08:33 |
| SpamBayes Score | -1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified | Yes |
| Message-id | <1506049714.53.0.225807359245.issue31452@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content | |
|---|---|
I'm afraid I no longer have all the details of this design in my head, and I have no idea what the fix does (and no time to read up on everything). The OP says "If you do not await gather" -- what happens if you *do* await it? Do the tasks then get killed? It seems strange to both cancel the task *and* set its exception. The docstring for gather() seems to be pretty clear that cancellation and failure of one task should not affect other tasks. So this argues against the PR. |
|
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2017-09-22 03:08:34 | gvanrossum | set | recipients: + gvanrossum, asvetlov, yselivanov, kwarunek, Andrew Lytvyn |
| 2017-09-22 03:08:34 | gvanrossum | set | messageid: <1506049714.53.0.225807359245.issue31452@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| 2017-09-22 03:08:34 | gvanrossum | link | issue31452 messages |
| 2017-09-22 03:08:34 | gvanrossum | create | |