Message303561
| Author | rhettinger |
|---|---|
| Recipients | berker.peksag, gvx, rhettinger, serhiy.storchaka |
| Date | 2017-10-02.19:27:06 |
| SpamBayes Score | -1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified | Yes |
| Message-id | <1506972426.39.0.213398074469.issue31325@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content | |
|---|---|
There is no rule that something had to be a tuple at some point in its history before becoming a named tuple. This use seems perfectly reasonable to me. |
|
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2017-10-02 19:27:06 | rhettinger | set | recipients: + rhettinger, berker.peksag, serhiy.storchaka, gvx |
| 2017-10-02 19:27:06 | rhettinger | set | messageid: <1506972426.39.0.213398074469.issue31325@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| 2017-10-02 19:27:06 | rhettinger | link | issue31325 messages |
| 2017-10-02 19:27:06 | rhettinger | create | |