Message304714
| Author | pitrou |
|---|---|
| Recipients | Birne94, Connor.Wolf, Giovanni.Bajo, Winterflower, bobbyi, dan.oreilly, davin, emptysquare, forest_atq, gregory.p.smith, ionelmc, jcea, lesha, neologix, nirai, nirs, pitrou, sbt, sdaoden, tshepang, vinay.sajip, vstinner |
| Date | 2017-10-21.17:00:41 |
| SpamBayes Score | -1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified | Yes |
| Message-id | <1508605242.01.0.213398074469.issue6721@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content | |
|---|---|
I think we should somehow move forward on this, at least for logging locks which can be quite an annoyance. There are two possible approaches: - either a generic mechanism as posted by sbt in reinit_locks_2.diff - or a logging-specific fix using os.register_at_fork() What do you think? |
|
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2017-10-21 17:00:42 | pitrou | set | recipients: + pitrou, gregory.p.smith, vinay.sajip, jcea, nirs, vstinner, nirai, forest_atq, ionelmc, bobbyi, neologix, Giovanni.Bajo, sdaoden, tshepang, sbt, lesha, emptysquare, dan.oreilly, davin, Connor.Wolf, Winterflower, Birne94 |
| 2017-10-21 17:00:42 | pitrou | set | messageid: <1508605242.01.0.213398074469.issue6721@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| 2017-10-21 17:00:42 | pitrou | link | issue6721 messages |
| 2017-10-21 17:00:41 | pitrou | create | |