Message305122
| Author | vstinner |
|---|---|
| Recipients | benjamin.peterson, neologix, njs, pitrou, rhettinger, skrah, tim.peters, trent, vstinner, wscullin, xdegaye |
| Date | 2017-10-27.14:14:48 |
| SpamBayes Score | -1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified | Yes |
| Message-id | <1509113688.71.0.213398074469.issue18835@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content | |
|---|---|
PR 4089 becomes much more larger than what I expected, so I propose to defer enhancements to following PR, especially the idea of "emulating" PyMem_AlignedAlloc() on top of PyMem_Malloc() if the user calls PyMem_SetAllocators() without implemented aligned_alloc. |
|
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2017-10-27 14:14:48 | vstinner | set | recipients: + vstinner, tim.peters, rhettinger, pitrou, benjamin.peterson, trent, njs, skrah, neologix, xdegaye, wscullin |
| 2017-10-27 14:14:48 | vstinner | set | messageid: <1509113688.71.0.213398074469.issue18835@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| 2017-10-27 14:14:48 | vstinner | link | issue18835 messages |
| 2017-10-27 14:14:48 | vstinner | create | |