Message305201
| Author | martin.panter |
|---|---|
| Recipients | belopolsky, martin.panter, serhiy.storchaka |
| Date | 2017-10-30.01:30:01 |
| SpamBayes Score | -1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified | Yes |
| Message-id | <1509327003.95.0.213398074469.issue31894@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content | |
|---|---|
Are you sure it is a “system” bug? As far as I understand, at least Posix does not require support for local time before 1970. See <http://pubs.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/9699919799/basedefs/V1_chap04.html#tag_04_16>. But why is localtime(14400) relevant? The documentation only says “datetime.timestamp” calls “mktime”, which should be valid since the UTC-5 timezone offset will give a positive timestamp. Perhaps is this similar to Issue 29097, probing a date before 1970? |
|
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2017-10-30 01:30:04 | martin.panter | set | recipients: + martin.panter, belopolsky, serhiy.storchaka |
| 2017-10-30 01:30:03 | martin.panter | set | messageid: <1509327003.95.0.213398074469.issue31894@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| 2017-10-30 01:30:03 | martin.panter | link | issue31894 messages |
| 2017-10-30 01:30:01 | martin.panter | create | |