Message305287
| Author | serhiy.storchaka |
|---|---|
| Recipients | eric.smith, mickey695, serhiy.storchaka |
| Date | 2017-10-31.11:23:41 |
| SpamBayes Score | -1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified | Yes |
| Message-id | <1509449021.92.0.213398074469.issue31907@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content | |
|---|---|
I have wrote a patch that change the parser to only accept valid identifiers. But now I have the same doubts and want first to discuss this [1]. This change can break the existing code as Eric's example shows. [1] https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2017-October/150052.html |
|
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2017-10-31 11:23:41 | serhiy.storchaka | set | recipients: + serhiy.storchaka, eric.smith, mickey695 |
| 2017-10-31 11:23:41 | serhiy.storchaka | set | messageid: <1509449021.92.0.213398074469.issue31907@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| 2017-10-31 11:23:41 | serhiy.storchaka | link | issue31907 messages |
| 2017-10-31 11:23:41 | serhiy.storchaka | create | |