Message305304
| Author | vstinner |
|---|---|
| Recipients | benjamin.peterson, neologix, njs, pitrou, rhettinger, skrah, tim.peters, trent, vstinner, wscullin, xdegaye |
| Date | 2017-10-31.14:26:16 |
| SpamBayes Score | -1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified | Yes |
| Message-id | <1509459976.6.0.213398074469.issue18835@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content | |
|---|---|
Stefan Krah: "we care about the C11 restriction? (...) "size - number of bytes to allocate. An integral multiple of alignment" (...) posix_memalign and _aligned_malloc don't care about the multiple." I prefer to ignore this restriction at this point. I wouldn't be surprised if posix_memalign() and _aligned_malloc() already align the size for us internally. We can add the restriction later, if needed. |
|
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2017-10-31 14:26:16 | vstinner | set | recipients: + vstinner, tim.peters, rhettinger, pitrou, benjamin.peterson, trent, njs, skrah, neologix, xdegaye, wscullin |
| 2017-10-31 14:26:16 | vstinner | set | messageid: <1509459976.6.0.213398074469.issue18835@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| 2017-10-31 14:26:16 | vstinner | link | issue18835 messages |
| 2017-10-31 14:26:16 | vstinner | create | |