Message305507
| Author | terry.reedy |
|---|---|
| Recipients | gdr@garethrees.org, haneef95, lemburg, steven.daprano, terry.reedy |
| Date | 2017-11-03.20:51:07 |
| SpamBayes Score | -1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified | Yes |
| Message-id | <1509742267.72.0.213398074469.issue31895@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content | |
|---|---|
Haneef, thank you for the explanation. Any such addition would need a PEP. But I agree with Marc-Andre that supporting the multitude of calendars is out of scope for the stdlib. So I suspect such a PEP would be rejected, with the suggestion already given here, that this belongs on PyPI. An existing example is the time module of the astropy module, http://docs.astropy.org/en/stable/time/index.html . I could be wrong, but I have a vague impression that expanding calendar support has been requested and rejected before. We have enough to do properly supporting the existing time, datetime, and calendar modules. |
|
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2017-11-03 20:51:07 | terry.reedy | set | recipients: + terry.reedy, lemburg, steven.daprano, gdr@garethrees.org, haneef95 |
| 2017-11-03 20:51:07 | terry.reedy | set | messageid: <1509742267.72.0.213398074469.issue31895@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| 2017-11-03 20:51:07 | terry.reedy | link | issue31895 messages |
| 2017-11-03 20:51:07 | terry.reedy | create | |