Message306677
| Author | vinay.sajip |
|---|---|
| Recipients | Antony.Lee, vinay.sajip |
| Date | 2017-11-21.19:03:56 |
| SpamBayes Score | -1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified | Yes |
| Message-id | <1511291037.04.0.213398074469.issue30811@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content | |
|---|---|
Can you explain why virtualenv and venv need to be mixed in this way, other than as an academic exercise? If you use -m venv for both inner and outer venvs, then it seems to work as expected. I'm planning to close this as "not a bug" unless you can provide a reason why this use case needs to be supported. |
|
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2017-11-21 19:03:57 | vinay.sajip | set | recipients: + vinay.sajip, Antony.Lee |
| 2017-11-21 19:03:57 | vinay.sajip | set | messageid: <1511291037.04.0.213398074469.issue30811@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| 2017-11-21 19:03:57 | vinay.sajip | link | issue30811 messages |
| 2017-11-21 19:03:56 | vinay.sajip | create | |