Message306840
| Author | yselivanov |
|---|---|
| Recipients | Inyeol.Lee, Jim Fasarakis-Hilliard, arigo, belopolsky, benjamin.peterson, danielsh, emptysquare, erickt, esc24, georg.brandl, glyph, gvanrossum, levkivskyi, ncoghlan, rhettinger, serhiy.storchaka, yselivanov |
| Date | 2017-11-23.16:42:36 |
| SpamBayes Score | -1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified | Yes |
| Message-id | <1511455356.53.0.213398074469.issue10544@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content | |
|---|---|
> Well, after all I am thinking maybe it is indeed makes sense to ban `yield` inside both sync/async and both comprehensions/generator expressions.
I agree, as I can't imagine a real use case for
a = ((yield a) for a in as)
which is really equivalent to
def a():
for a in as:
yield (yield a) |
|
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2017-11-23 16:42:36 | yselivanov | set | recipients: + yselivanov, gvanrossum, arigo, georg.brandl, rhettinger, ncoghlan, belopolsky, benjamin.peterson, erickt, glyph, Inyeol.Lee, serhiy.storchaka, esc24, danielsh, emptysquare, levkivskyi, Jim Fasarakis-Hilliard |
| 2017-11-23 16:42:36 | yselivanov | set | messageid: <1511455356.53.0.213398074469.issue10544@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| 2017-11-23 16:42:36 | yselivanov | link | issue10544 messages |
| 2017-11-23 16:42:36 | yselivanov | create | |