Message309122
| Author | mdk |
|---|---|
| Recipients | asvetlov, eli.bendersky, gphemsley, mdk, scoder, thatiparthy |
| Date | 2017-12-28.11:19:20 |
| SpamBayes Score | -1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified | Yes |
| Message-id | <1514459960.66.0.213398074469.issue32424@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content | |
|---|---|
I don't agree with the API breakage, the C implementation of the module does not expose copy(), so code using copy() is already broken (since 2005) in cases the C implementation is used. I also expect the C implementation to be used almost anywhere, but I may be wrong on this point: in which case the Python implementation may still be used? |
|
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2017-12-28 11:19:20 | mdk | set | recipients: + mdk, scoder, eli.bendersky, asvetlov, thatiparthy, gphemsley |
| 2017-12-28 11:19:20 | mdk | set | messageid: <1514459960.66.0.213398074469.issue32424@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| 2017-12-28 11:19:20 | mdk | link | issue32424 messages |
| 2017-12-28 11:19:20 | mdk | create | |