Message309143
| Author | asvetlov |
|---|---|
| Recipients | asvetlov, eli.bendersky, gphemsley, mdk, p-ganssle, scoder, thatiparthy |
| Date | 2017-12-28.22:16:35 |
| SpamBayes Score | -1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified | Yes |
| Message-id | <1514499395.08.0.213398074469.issue32424@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content | |
|---|---|
For derivative Python implementation there is a standard strategy: they uses a copy of CPython standard library. Tthat's why any new module should have a pure Python implementation and that's why https://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0399/ exists. Jython has copy() method as well. IronPython has it. I doubt if an implementation without xml.etree.ElementTree.Element.copy exists at all. The method removal breaks backward compatibility without a reason, __copy__ alias is valuable and backward compatible change. |
|
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2017-12-28 22:16:35 | asvetlov | set | recipients: + asvetlov, scoder, eli.bendersky, thatiparthy, mdk, p-ganssle, gphemsley |
| 2017-12-28 22:16:35 | asvetlov | set | messageid: <1514499395.08.0.213398074469.issue32424@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| 2017-12-28 22:16:35 | asvetlov | link | issue32424 messages |
| 2017-12-28 22:16:35 | asvetlov | create | |