Message309785
| Author | ncoghlan |
|---|---|
| Recipients | Greg.Slodkowicz, Segev Finer, belopolsky, eric.araujo, eric.snow, georg.brandl, giampaolo.rodola, mariocj89, ncoghlan, piotr.dobrogost, terry.reedy |
| Date | 2018-01-10.23:52:52 |
| SpamBayes Score | -1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified | Yes |
| Message-id | <1515628372.11.0.467229070634.issue9325@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content | |
|---|---|
While I do think it makes sense to enhance `dis` in this regard, I'm also thinking it might be better to have that automatically fall back to a `python -m inspect module:qualname` style lookup in the event that `os.path.exists(infile)` is false. So considering it out of scope for *this* issue makes sense. |
|
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2018-01-10 23:52:52 | ncoghlan | set | recipients: + ncoghlan, georg.brandl, terry.reedy, belopolsky, giampaolo.rodola, eric.araujo, Greg.Slodkowicz, eric.snow, piotr.dobrogost, Segev Finer, mariocj89 |
| 2018-01-10 23:52:52 | ncoghlan | set | messageid: <1515628372.11.0.467229070634.issue9325@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| 2018-01-10 23:52:52 | ncoghlan | link | issue9325 messages |
| 2018-01-10 23:52:52 | ncoghlan | create | |