Message309800
| Author | asvetlov |
|---|---|
| Recipients | asvetlov, gvanrossum, socketpair, yselivanov |
| Date | 2018-01-11.09:48:19 |
| SpamBayes Score | -1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified | Yes |
| Message-id | <1515664099.87.0.467229070634.issue32528@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content | |
|---|---|
Honestly I have no strong opinion. Correct code should not be affected, if somebody want to handle task cancellation explicitly -- he already have `except CancelledError` in his code. What are use cases for intentional catching Exception for task cancellation prevention? Could we add a warning for this case without base exception class change? I don't see how to do it but maybe somebody has an idea? |
|
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2018-01-11 09:48:19 | asvetlov | set | recipients: + asvetlov, gvanrossum, socketpair, yselivanov |
| 2018-01-11 09:48:19 | asvetlov | set | messageid: <1515664099.87.0.467229070634.issue32528@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| 2018-01-11 09:48:19 | asvetlov | link | issue32528 messages |
| 2018-01-11 09:48:19 | asvetlov | create | |