Message309953
| Author | serhiy.storchaka |
|---|---|
| Recipients | asvetlov, eli.bendersky, gphemsley, mdk, p-ganssle, r.david.murray, scoder, serhiy.storchaka, thatiparthy |
| Date | 2018-01-15.08:12:30 |
| SpamBayes Score | -1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified | Yes |
| Message-id | <1516003950.96.0.467229070634.issue32424@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content | |
|---|---|
> As discussed above, starting with msg309074, __deepcopy__() is being added to the Python implementation because it already exists in the C implementation. Python implementation shouldn't copy all implementation details of the C implementation. This is cumbersome and often impossible. Both implementation should have the same behavior, and they do have. > And additional tests have in fact uncovered further discrepancies between the Python and C implementations with regard to copying behavior. What are these discrepancies? In any case it is better to extend existing tests by adding missed checks than duplicate tests. |
|
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2018-01-15 08:12:31 | serhiy.storchaka | set | recipients: + serhiy.storchaka, scoder, r.david.murray, eli.bendersky, asvetlov, thatiparthy, mdk, p-ganssle, gphemsley |
| 2018-01-15 08:12:30 | serhiy.storchaka | set | messageid: <1516003950.96.0.467229070634.issue32424@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| 2018-01-15 08:12:30 | serhiy.storchaka | link | issue32424 messages |
| 2018-01-15 08:12:30 | serhiy.storchaka | create | |