Message310329
| Author | serhiy.storchaka |
|---|---|
| Recipients | Mark.Shannon, gvanrossum, levkivskyi, rhettinger, serhiy.storchaka, yselivanov |
| Date | 2018-01-20.07:49:50 |
| SpamBayes Score | -1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified | Yes |
| Message-id | <1516434590.8.0.467229070634.issue32550@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content | |
|---|---|
> This PR moves the constant for the name from `co_names` to `co_consts`. There is no duplication. But if there is an initializer, the name is left in `co_names` too. I don't think this (as well as possible performance difference) is important. My only concerns are about subtle behavior differences. For example, is the name always interned (even if long or non-ASCII)? Does any code depend on interning keys in __annotations__? (There is a code that depends on interning keys in type.__dict__). |
|
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2018-01-20 07:49:50 | serhiy.storchaka | set | recipients: + serhiy.storchaka, gvanrossum, rhettinger, Mark.Shannon, yselivanov, levkivskyi |
| 2018-01-20 07:49:50 | serhiy.storchaka | set | messageid: <1516434590.8.0.467229070634.issue32550@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| 2018-01-20 07:49:50 | serhiy.storchaka | link | issue32550 messages |
| 2018-01-20 07:49:50 | serhiy.storchaka | create | |