Message311730
| Author | Phaqui |
|---|---|
| Recipients | Phaqui, Roy Williams, gregory.p.smith, ned.deily, njs, serhiy.storchaka |
| Date | 2018-02-06.16:10:54 |
| SpamBayes Score | -1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified | Yes |
| Message-id | <1517933454.04.0.467229070634.issue31961@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content | |
|---|---|
What do you mean "is a bug", and "the PR would encourage this"? Can't it be fixed? Are you saying that just because it is a bug now, we should be discouraged from making it work in the way you'd expect it to work? If `exe` is a path, these two lines of code should do exactly the same, right? It seems unintuitive to me if they produce different results. run(exe) run([exe]) |
|
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2018-02-06 16:10:54 | Phaqui | set | recipients: + Phaqui, gregory.p.smith, ned.deily, njs, serhiy.storchaka, Roy Williams |
| 2018-02-06 16:10:54 | Phaqui | set | messageid: <1517933454.04.0.467229070634.issue31961@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| 2018-02-06 16:10:54 | Phaqui | link | issue31961 messages |
| 2018-02-06 16:10:54 | Phaqui | create | |